BlackBerry Forums Support Community - View Single Post - UMA seems to work better on the 8900 than the 83xx

betabob · 02-22-2009, 10:21 AM

Not sure if anyone else thinks this, but I've been overseas this past week and am using UMA a fair amount. I have to say that it seems to work quite a bit better than on my previous 8320. On the 8320 I would get frequent call drops, and even when I didn't calls would often be "choppy" sounding. I'm wondering if perhaps UMA is pretty CPU intensive and so with the faster processor in the 8900 there is less of a CPU burden. Anyway, just a guess...but I'm a much happier UMA user on the 8900.

02-22-2009, 10:21 AM	#1 (permalink)
betabob Thumbs Must Hurt Join Date: Sep 2004 Model: 8900 Carrier: t-mobile Posts: 56 Post Thanks: 0 Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts	UMA seems to work better on the 8900 than the 83xx Please Login to Remove! Not sure if anyone else thinks this, but I've been overseas this past week and am using UMA a fair amount. I have to say that it seems to work quite a bit better than on my previous 8320. On the 8320 I would get frequent call drops, and even when I didn't calls would often be "choppy" sounding. I'm wondering if perhaps UMA is pretty CPU intensive and so with the faster processor in the 8900 there is less of a CPU burden. Anyway, just a guess...but I'm a much happier UMA user on the 8900.
Offline