Originally Posted by juwaack68
Well that's where I have a problem. You say 'if needed', which tells me that if someone had not asked for cash (if they had no clue what they were doing, perhaps) you would not have voluntarily offered cash.
At least, that's how I'm reading it.
You're reading it incorrectly. But, even so...and if a member got his/her Torch for $199 which is the new-committment price through AT&T, and wanted to trade for my 9700, which is also $199 with new-contract on AT&T right now...and if both phones were as-new, then who's to say what would be fair? I have made similar trades when I was having issues with a phone, and I had gone past my 30-day exchange limits.
A member has complete and total right to trade any way he/she sees fit without the guidance of another member or a moderator/coach...isn't that true?