View Single Post
Old 10-04-2010, 11:51 AM   #5 (permalink)
Justa82
Thumbs Must Hurt
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Model: 8100
PIN: N/A
Carrier: Cingular
Posts: 55
Post Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default

Quote:
BES aside, which I know very little about.... For the consumer on BIS, so far as I know there is no malware that on its own without permission of the user can install on a blackberry. There is one case I heard of -- only one case -- of malware produced for blackberry, perhaps as a proof of concept, but it still required the user to install it.

For that matter, nothing installs on the blackberry without the user allowing it. And the user has control over the application permissions.

When the user sets a device password, there is a default 10 allowed attempts, or the max allowed attempts set by the user, and after that the device wipes. If the user has also enabled content protection, then the memory is scrubbed. There is no security question. No time out. Exceed the max attempts and all user data is removed.

Content protection, when enabled, encrypts data on the device so that data cannot be accessed even by direct access to the chips.

Blackberry messenger messages are strictly speaking not encrypted, but are scrambled.

All this is public information. A little searching will find this, and more.
Allow me to be a little more specific...my question has evolved slightly.

The iPhone has content protection in the form of full device encryption, just like Blackberry, right? The iPhone has a passcode, just like Blackberry. I'm specifically trying to understand why the iPhone has been hacked incredibly easily, whereas my understanding is that if a hacker stole my Blackberry, there's absolutely no way he could siphon my data from my device....e.g., it's impossible. I'm not referring to BBM, application permissions, BIS vs BES, or malware.

Is the answer as simple as "the Blackberry's implementation of content protection is superior to Apple's"?
Offline   Reply With Quote