Thread: RIM vs. Samsung
View Single Post
  (#83 (permalink)) Old
DallasFlier Offline
BlackBerry Extraordinaire
 
DallasFlier's Avatar
 
Posts: 1,210
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Dallas, TX
Model: 8310
OS: 4.5.0.69
PIN: OT NOIR
Carrier: AT&T/Cingular/AT&T
Default 12-19-2006, 05:55 PM

Quote:
Originally Posted by GMK
Sure they did. It took me 20 seconds on the USPTO site to come up with:

Published for Opposition December 29, 1998
Registration Number 2293011
Registration Date November 16, 1999
Owner (REGISTRANT) INFOGEAR TECHNOLOGY CORPORATION CORPORATION CALIFORNIA 1775 WOODSIDE ROAD REDWOOD CITY CALIFORNIA 94061

(LAST LISTED OWNER) CISCO TECNOLOGY, INC. CORPORATION CALIFORNIA 170 WEST TASMAN SAN JOSE CALIFORNIA 95134

I can't post the search result link but you can start here: United States Patent and Trademark Office Home Page then go to trademark then search.

There's a lot more but this is the grist. There are 9 listings for IPHONE but only one registered.

Well I guess we wait and see. If industry rumors are correct I believe 1st Qtr '07 and some say as early as January for the Apple iPhone?
So its actually been a registered trademark of Cisco or companies that Cisco has subsequently become owner of, since November 16, 1999 - over 7 years now.

So, I have two questions:

1) Who's going to file suit first - Cisco/Linksys or Apple?

2) What's Apple going to end up calling their phone instead? Lets see, "Pod" has nothing inherently to do with music, so why does this need to have anything to do with phones? Hmm, how about... the iBerry!


Top 50 Year Win%: Nebraska-.769 tOSU-.757 Penn St-.739 Texas-.736
Michigan-.730 Oklahoma-.729 Alabama-.727 USC-.713
Dominance! The HUSKER Tradition!