View Single Post
Old 06-10-2008, 04:32 AM   #14 (permalink)
Stern
Thumbs Must Hurt
 
Stern's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Model: 9700
Carrier: Vodafone UK
Posts: 106
Post Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Keyscan View Post
I am not sure where you are going with this post. He was correct in his assertion.
Seriously? You have just agreed with me that the provisioning system is a RIM system, Infact most of your post is exactly what I said in different words so how is gibson correct in his assertion that my post is the "Most.incorrect.statement.ever"

Quote:
Originally Posted by Keyscan
And as for BELL, it was their technicians/support staff that ended up blocking this user's access to BES. they changed the option to "ConsumerPRO" instead of Enterprise and Consumer/Prosumer services. Yes, it is RIMs systems that they are modifying, but it is the carrier that is in control of setting up enterprise, not RIM's support staff, hence Bell being completely responsible.
If you read my post this is exactly what I was getting at,

Quote:
Originally Posted by ME!
It's up to carriers to make sure the device is provisioned correctly on the RIM infrastructure
it's Bell's problem to sort out, always has been and always will be.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Keyscan
Also, it isn't a least cost routing. It is a "still handled by desktop" flag that is often referred to as serial bypass when the BES forwards messages internally to a cradled device on port 4101.
How is this not a form of least cost routing?
Offline   Reply With Quote