BlackBerry Forums Support Community               

Closed Thread
 
LinkBack Thread Tools
Old 01-24-2006, 08:37 AM   #1 (permalink)
BlackBerry God
 
jibi's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Jibi's Secret Place
Model: 8900
OS: 4.6.1.174
Carrier: AT&T
Posts: 11,310
Post Thanks: 0
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
Default [2006-01-23] RIM Provides Update on NTP Litigation

Please Login to Remove!

Waterloo, ON - The U.S. Supreme Court (“Supreme Court”) issued an order today in the patent litigation between Research In Motion Limited ("RIM") and NTP, Inc. ("NTP"). The Supreme Court denied RIM’s petition for certiorari that requested the Supreme Court to review issues concerning the extraterritorial reach of U.S. patent law. While review by the Supreme Court is generally uncommon, RIM sought review because it believes the case raises significant national and international issues. Today’s order has no bearing on the merits of the outstanding issues in the case before the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia (“District Court”).

The District Court will set a hearing date at a later time for further proceedings in the case based on the remand from the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit (“Federal Circuit”). The Federal Circuit decision of August 2, 2005 vacated the injunction and damages award originally entered as a result of the District Court trial in 2002 and remanded the case to the District Court for further proceedings. The Federal Circuit decision also reversed or vacated the infringement finding on 9 of the 16 litigated patent claims.

During the upcoming proceedings, the District Court will be asked to decide a variety of matters relating to the litigation, including the impact of the Federal Circuit’s reversal of infringement findings on issues of liability and damages. In its briefings, NTP has asked the District Court to enter a new injunction prohibiting RIM from providing BlackBerry service and from using, selling, manufacturing or importing its handhelds and software in the United States. The District Court will schedule a hearing prior to deciding each of these matters. RIM maintains that an injunction is inappropriate given the specific facts of this case, including:

• the outright rejection of all NTP patent claims in rigorous Office Actions* already issued by the Patent Office, including second Office Actions in three of the four remaining patents in the litigation that sustained rejections after taking into account NTP’s arguments seeking to overturn them;

• the ability to fully compensate NTP through ongoing royalty payments in lieu of an injunction;

• the Supreme Court’s November 28 decision to hear the appeal in the case of MercExchange v. eBay on questions relating to the propriety of injunctions in patent litigation;

• the lack of any practical mechanism to prevent an injunction from having an unintended effect on users in the public and private sectors who would be, or who the District Court determines should be, exempt; and

• public interest concerns relating to any potential suspension or interruption of BlackBerry service in the United States.

RIM believes these factors should hold significant weight in any decisions relating to an injunction, however it will ultimately be up to the courts to decide these matters and there can never be an assurance of a favorable outcome in any litigation.

It is also anticipated that the reexamination of NTP's patents by the United States Patent and Trademark Office will continue with special dispatch. All of the NTP patent claims have now been rejected by the Patent Office in its initial rulings in reexamination proceedings, based in part on prior art not considered in the District Court trial in 2002.

As a contingency, RIM has also been preparing software workaround designs which it intends to implement if necessary to maintain the operation of BlackBerry services in the United States.

* The rejections of NTP patents in the initial and second Office Actions issued by the Patent Office were based in part on prior art not considered in the District Court trial in 2002 and were derived through a recently improved Patent Office process whereby reexamination decisions now require thorough review and unanimous agreement from a panel of supervisors and senior patent examiners (see press release titled “USPTO IMPROVES PROCESS FOR REVIEWING PATENTS” at http://www.uspto.gov/web/offices/com...hes/05-38.htm).
__________________
In the beginning the Universe was created. This has made a lot of people very angry and is widely regarded as a bad move.
Offline  
Old 01-24-2006, 08:46 AM   #2 (permalink)
Grumpy Moderator
 
NJBlackBerry's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Somewhere in the swamps of Jersey
Model: iPh6
Carrier: AT&T
Posts: 27,813
Post Thanks: 33
Thanked 442 Times in 382 Posts
Default

Somewhere in the background I hear the classic song "Don't Worry, Be Happy" playing...
Offline  
Old 01-24-2006, 08:53 AM   #3 (permalink)
BlackBerry God
 
jibi's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Jibi's Secret Place
Model: 8900
OS: 4.6.1.174
Carrier: AT&T
Posts: 11,310
Post Thanks: 0
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
Default

Now if every single person in my department and various others in this company would hear the same music... the emails, hallway discussions (with an uninformed mail guy, no less), the IMs, the phone calls... ugh!
__________________
In the beginning the Universe was created. This has made a lot of people very angry and is widely regarded as a bad move.
Offline  
Old 01-24-2006, 08:55 AM   #4 (permalink)
iPhone Convert
 
juwaack68's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Tulip City - MI
Model: iP5
OS: 6.0.2
PIN: to beans
Carrier: I'm not
Posts: 13,875
Post Thanks: 3
Thanked 72 Times in 55 Posts
Default

Oh, come on, it's so much fun to see the look on the uninformed users face when you tell them they have 27 minutes until their Blackberry will self destruct.....
Offline  
Old 01-24-2006, 08:56 AM   #5 (permalink)
Grumpy Moderator
 
NJBlackBerry's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Somewhere in the swamps of Jersey
Model: iPh6
Carrier: AT&T
Posts: 27,813
Post Thanks: 33
Thanked 442 Times in 382 Posts
Default

Stunningly I have no gotten one e-mail, SMS or IM about this!
I did preempt a lot of noise by sending a note out to our CIO...
Offline  
Old 01-24-2006, 09:03 AM   #6 (permalink)
iPhone Convert
 
juwaack68's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Tulip City - MI
Model: iP5
OS: 6.0.2
PIN: to beans
Carrier: I'm not
Posts: 13,875
Post Thanks: 3
Thanked 72 Times in 55 Posts
Default

I've received several calls and emails on it (not bad considering we have 350+ users worldwide). When I tell them I'm not worried about it (being the BES admin), they relax. Funny enough, the top brass hasn't asked at all. I'm pretty sure they make themselves as informed as possible so don't panic at headlines screaming "Blackberry maker may be forced to shut down". The media is hyping it all just to sell papers....and panic the anxiety- ridden user.

EDIT: DOH! I *just* received an email from an anxiety-ridden user - "Rumor has it Blackberry eMail may go away. What do you think?". It's going to be a long day....

On a more serious note, has anyone sent an email to all of their BB users to bring them up to date, or do you think it's better to not say anything (to avoid panic in people who've been living in a cave) and address questions as they come up?

Last edited by juwaack68 : 01-24-2006 at 09:26 AM.
Offline  
Old 01-24-2006, 10:25 AM   #7 (permalink)
Knows Where the Search Button Is
 
shawn86mr2's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Model: 7520
Posts: 17
Post Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default

Why doesnt Tmobile get sued for their email service. I used tmobile SIDEKICK and they basically have the same setup.
is it Blackberry is bigger so they go after the company with the most money?
Offline  
Old 01-24-2006, 03:55 PM   #8 (permalink)
CrackBerry Addict
 
Jagga's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Toronto
Model: Z10
Carrier: Lord Rogers - 107
Posts: 862
Post Thanks: 6
Thanked 6 Times in 5 Posts
Default Tmobile & Sidekick Email

Well the Sidekick branded email service is the exact same as the Hiptop email service as West Mobile in the USA & Tmobile in Germany & Fido here in Canada. This means its NOT Tmobile's email service - just the Sidekick branding is theirs - its actually Danger, Inc.'s service. This is the designer of all Sidekick/Hiptop devices & the host of their email service; which is incredibly similar.
Offline  
Old 01-24-2006, 09:00 PM   #9 (permalink)
Knows Where the Search Button Is
 
shawn86mr2's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Model: 7520
Posts: 17
Post Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default

yeah i know about that part of it.. But if im understanding the "problem" ntp is the way the email is handled? with the email constantly delivered "live" to the BB's . the danger email service does the same thing. same idea . so why hasnt NTP gone after danger's way of emailing service.
Offline  
Old 01-24-2006, 09:01 PM   #10 (permalink)
Knows Where the Search Button Is
 
shawn86mr2's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Model: 7520
Posts: 17
Post Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default

i know this the email for tmobile is blahblah.sidekick.dngr.com and suncom is blahblah.hiptop.dngr.com
Offline  
Old 01-24-2006, 11:22 PM   #11 (permalink)
Talking BlackBerry Encyclopedia
 
udontknowjack's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: State of Confusion
Model: 9000
Carrier: T-Mobile
Posts: 483
Post Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default

I don't think they work the same. RIM truly "pushes" the email to the device. The others pull or do a push/pull of some sort. If RIM was push/pull, I don't think it would violate the patents in question. However, it would be going backwards in RIMs eyes because their big selling point is "true push email" Hint on work around!!!!
Offline  
Old 01-25-2006, 08:03 AM   #12 (permalink)
Knows Where the Search Button Is
 
shawn86mr2's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Model: 7520
Posts: 17
Post Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default

I had the sidekickII and I know what your saying but Honestly the sidekick was like 1 to 2 seconds slower. I sat ehre and emailed both devices from my desktop.
Offline  
Closed Thread


Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On





Copyright © 2004-2014 BlackBerryForums.com.
The names RIM © and BlackBerry © are registered Trademarks of BlackBerry Inc.