[Barakl]

I'm trying to recieve e-mails to my BB simulator in order to test some featues I implemented.
I'm using ESS (Email server simulation) configured in connected mode in order to connect to my simulator.
I've done all the necessary configuration (My exchange server is open for SMTP and POP3, my e-mail is correctly configured and so on...) and I'm getting a weird problem.
When trying to send e-mails out of my symulator everything is working fine.
The connection to my inbox also works fine and is able to scan my e-mail for incoming mails, the thing is that I get the following message:

<Tue Aug 07 12:08:24 IDT 2007>: [52] :<DEBUG>:<LAYER = ESS, Checking for new messages...>
<Tue Aug 07 12:08:24 IDT 2007>: [53] :<DEBUG>:<LAYER = ESS, Count[30] LastIndex[29]>
<Tue Aug 07 12:08:24 IDT 2007>: [54] :<DEBUG>:<LAYER = ESS, msgs.length = 1>
<Tue Aug 07 12:08:24 IDT 2007>: [55] :<DEBUG>:<LAYER = ESS, SKIPPING MESSAGE:n uid=1>
<Tue Aug 07 12:08:26 IDT 2007>: [56] :<DEBUG>:<LAYER = ESS, Checking for new messages...>
<Tue Aug 07 12:08:26 IDT 2007>: [57] :<DEBUG>:<LAYER = ESS, Count[30] LastIndex[30]>

This basicly means that the ESS found the message and for some reason decided to SKIP it (look at log line 55).

Does anyone have an idea?
I'm fresh out of them.

thnx,
Barak.

[Barakl]

I've neglected some details which I thought warent relevant.

The first mail that I sent to my address did in fact reach the simulator, no other e-mails arrived and all got the same SKIPPING MESSAGE log.

I tried using a new mail address in my server.
The new mail address worked same as the first (meanning the only the first message arrived and all other are SKIPPED).
This makes it even more bizar...

Any ideas?

[Barakl]

Well, after alot of fighting with the environment I believe I solved this issue.
It turns out that the entire recieving problem happens only on EXCHANGE SERVER 2007.

I opened yet another account on my EXCHAGE SERVER 2003 and everything seems to be working just fine for now.

I have no idea if it's a EES bug or an EXCHANGE 2007 bug but in either way use 2003 instead.

I hope this post will help someone...

Cheers,
Barak.