Quote:
|
Originally Posted by TheBigNewt Yeah, it could be you next! Seriously, searches are kind of hit and miss as we all know. Just think what you'd get if you searched and got this thread....... |
There is a reason for that, and unfortunately it is a never-ending cycle.
Here's how it works:
1. User posts a question
2. Another user answers above question
3. Prior to attempting use the search function, a new user posts the same question, perhaps with different wording
4. Moderation staff does not move repetitive threads to a repository
5. Repeat steps 3-4
6. Another new user searches, but there are now too many repetitive threads, and the one with the answer is buried
7. The search function is now essentially useless
Here's how it
should work in Internet utopia:
1. User posts a question
2. Another user answers above question
3. Prior to posting, a new user searches and locates the above thread
4. If that thread doesn't help them, they then post their specific question, with a link to the thread they located
5. If the thread is deemed redundant by moderation, the thread is removed from the publicly viewable forum sections to a sort of thread recycle bin
6. If not redundant, another user answers
7. Repeat steps 3-6
8. The search function now is able to provide specific answers to specific questions
Now, obviously the search function does not perform at an optimal level when thread titles and thread content are ambiguous (e.g., "I need help! My BlackBerry doesn't work!"), and more commonly, thread titles and content are posted in badly mangled derivatives of the English language (e.g., "My blakbury is brokun!" Or my personal favorite: "Teather," or some derivation thereof.) Additionally, the search function is only as good as the person using it, and I don't think I need to elaborate on that subject.