Did everyone see "property of research in motion" sign in the picture which shows the area under the battery? So should Kevin be aware this might cause any legal action against him? Don't want to see one of my favorite sites getting in trouble because of this =(
Did everyone see "property of research in motion" sign in the picture which shows the area under the battery? So should Kevin be aware this might cause any legal action against him? Don't want to see one of my favorite sites getting in trouble because of this =(
I saw it and chuckled. While its cool to see stuff on the 9000 series ... if I had one I certainly wouldn't post pictures of it and my name on the Interweb.
omg! I WANT NOW!!! i dont care... i knew i should have got one off ebay...damn!
Cory Scheuer
Owner, C.C.G. Burning For all your unlocking needs | Fido and Rogers codes within hours! North American code 1-5 days! International codes 5-15 days!
__________________
Ex-Fido TechSupport
i love my pearl, but im ready for the 9000. unfortunately, i will have to wait for the CDMA to be released. However, by that time my contract will probably be up so i can get it for less with a new contract!
On a related note, intomobile.com is reporting that the eBay auction for the 9000 was indeed real. The owner is apparently thrilled with his $828 purchase. I for one am encouraged by the final price of that auction. If $828 is the typical over-inflated eBay price for an unreleased device then perhaps the official release will be at a much more reasonable cost.
The 9000 is nice, but I wish it was a little smaller.
Me too, and a little less uglier , it looks waaaaaaaaaaay too much like a iPhonesque device, something RIM needs to realize that they DO NOT need to do. They can stand on their own. I own a iPhone and I am drooling over the new 8330 which is proof positive that they need not follow the other manufacturers and try and follow apple's lead.
At this point RIM is getting all of the good press and buzz they could want regarding the BB9000 and going after a site that legally purchased the item without knowledge it was allegedly the "property of RIM". If RIM wants negative press they can certainly go after him or just refund the cash and go after the seller.
Anyone ever thought that those 9000 were planted there by RIM knowing what would happen when it hit the net? RIM could be testing the waters and be able to deny any knowledge of the leak. Could be a market research tool. OK OK so I watch too many spy movies but hey maybe.
At this point RIM is getting all of the good press and buzz they could want regarding the BB9000 and going after a site that legally purchased the item without knowledge it was allegedly the "property of RIM". If RIM wants negative press they can certainly go after him or just refund the cash and go after the seller.
In a word... what? how could the seller/buyer NOT know it was property of RIM. Who the heck else would it belong to?
First Real Bb 9000 Review -
05-06-2008, 03:36 AM
05-06-2008, 06:15 AM
... I'm ready for mine.
, it looks waaaaaaaaaaay too much like a iPhonesque device, something RIM needs to realize that they DO NOT need to do. They can stand on their own. I own a iPhone and I am drooling over the new 8330 which is proof positive that they need not follow the other manufacturers and try and follow apple's lead.
