BlackBerryForums.com : Your Number One BlackBerry Community  
   

»Sponsored Links



Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools
  (#1 (permalink)) Old
Skeets Offline
New Member
 
Posts: 12
Join Date: Jul 2007
Model: 8300
PIN: N/A
Carrier: Rogers
Default BB Bold GPS...assisted? - 07-09-2008, 03:20 PM

Can anyone confirm if the Bold has assisted GPS? I've read that assisted GPS enables a much faster satellite lock-on.

Thanks.
   
Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
Please Login or Register to Remove these Advertisements!

  (#2 (permalink)) Old
MBW Offline
Talking BlackBerry Encyclopedia
 
MBW's Avatar
 
Posts: 348
Join Date: May 2008
Model: 8110
PIN: N/A
Carrier: AT&T
Default 07-09-2008, 03:26 PM

Assisted GPS is only faster after an initial GPS fix, and any responsible design clears that when GPS goes idle for a long period.

I believe the *10 (like 8110) qualify as assisted GPS, so the Bold should as well.


/\/\\/\/
   
Reply With Quote
  (#3 (permalink)) Old
Spamdumpster Offline
CrackBerry Addict
 
Spamdumpster's Avatar
 
Posts: 598
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Boston, Mass.
Model: 8820
Carrier: at&t
Default 07-09-2008, 06:10 PM

Quote:
Originally Posted by MBW View Post
Assisted GPS is only faster after an initial GPS fix, and any responsible design clears that when GPS goes idle for a long period.

I believe the *10 (like 8110) qualify as assisted GPS, so the Bold should as well.
I could be wrong, but I though Assisted GPS meant that data receives over the network sped up the initial GPS lock.
   
Reply With Quote
  (#4 (permalink)) Old
MBW Offline
Talking BlackBerry Encyclopedia
 
MBW's Avatar
 
Posts: 348
Join Date: May 2008
Model: 8110
PIN: N/A
Carrier: AT&T
Default 07-09-2008, 09:50 PM

No, sorry.

An initial GPS fix requires a pretty long time because it takes more satellites, doesn't know which side of the planet it's on, etc. You can generally force GPS receivers to do that every time or you can let them take advantage of where they were last time as a head start, which lets a good fix happen with fewer satellites, fewer data points (meaning a shorter time) and fewer calculations.

GPS fixes happen in the satellite receiver, whether internal to the phone or in an external puck, and have nothing whatever to do with data connections; data connections come into play when you need to pull in a map or aerial view, but the application is just coordinating the position readings from the receiver with the (almost always) downloaded map's coordinate representations.

Hey - I think my thumbs just stopped hurting.


/\/\\/\/
   
Reply With Quote
  (#5 (permalink)) Old
numetheus Offline
CrackBerry Addict
 
numetheus's Avatar
 
Posts: 531
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Mesa, AZ
Model: 8310
PIN: 24259AA5
Carrier: AT&T
Default 07-09-2008, 11:23 PM

Assisted GPS is better than normal GPS and mainly helps the TTFF or Time To First Fix. Some pure GPS units that have a SiRF III chip, can take 30 seconds or more because it is dependent on your location, the amount of interference, and horizon information. It also takes a large number of satellite acquisitions because it doesn't know general location on cold start. So, in a large city, a full GPS system using SiRF III or anything like it will take longer than if you were out in the desert for example. Normal GPS also eats more power because of the constant acquisition of satellites ... and indoor use is limited.

aGPS takes information from the cell network to triangulate your general location from multiple towers. Since the phone has the GENERAL location from tower triangulation and other sources, it doesn't have to acquire as many satellites since it has most of the information it needs. It works better in doors because of an easier "fix" due to general location already determined by the cell network. And .... you also get better battery life because constant acquisition is not required.

Other than that ... aGPS and GPS are pretty much similar. Try it. Get a pure GPS unit and see how long it takes in-doors from a COLD START. Then get a known aGPS unit from a mobile phone and see how it works in the same in-door building. The aGPS will get a fix faster with few satellites ... well, if the pure GPS unit even makes it. LOL


Numetheus
The crazy Filipino!!

http://www.myspace.com/numetheus
PIN: 24259AA5
   
Reply With Quote
  (#6 (permalink)) Old
FullFlashGSMPH Offline
New Member
 
Posts: 11
Join Date: Jul 2008
Model: 7110g
PIN: N/A
Carrier: black
Default 07-09-2008, 11:31 PM

thanks usefull post and thread
   
Reply With Quote
  (#7 (permalink)) Old
Skeets Offline
New Member
 
Posts: 12
Join Date: Jul 2007
Model: 8300
PIN: N/A
Carrier: Rogers
Default 07-10-2008, 09:53 AM

Quote:
Originally Posted by numetheus View Post
Assisted GPS is better than normal GPS and mainly helps the TTFF or Time To First Fix. Some pure GPS units that have a SiRF III chip, can take 30 seconds or more because it is dependent on your location, the amount of interference, and horizon information. It also takes a large number of satellite acquisitions because it doesn't know general location on cold start. So, in a large city, a full GPS system using SiRF III or anything like it will take longer than if you were out in the desert for example. Normal GPS also eats more power because of the constant acquisition of satellites ... and indoor use is limited.

aGPS takes information from the cell network to triangulate your general location from multiple towers. Since the phone has the GENERAL location from tower triangulation and other sources, it doesn't have to acquire as many satellites since it has most of the information it needs. It works better in doors because of an easier "fix" due to general location already determined by the cell network. And .... you also get better battery life because constant acquisition is not required.

Other than that ... aGPS and GPS are pretty much similar. Try it. Get a pure GPS unit and see how long it takes in-doors from a COLD START. Then get a known aGPS unit from a mobile phone and see how it works in the same in-door building. The aGPS will get a fix faster with few satellites ... well, if the pure GPS unit even makes it. LOL
That's perfect.

So does the bold have aGPS?
   
Reply With Quote
  (#8 (permalink)) Old
numetheus Offline
CrackBerry Addict
 
numetheus's Avatar
 
Posts: 531
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Mesa, AZ
Model: 8310
PIN: 24259AA5
Carrier: AT&T
Default 07-10-2008, 10:41 AM

Wirelessly posted

Quote:
Originally Posted by Skeets
Quote:
Originally Posted by numetheus View Post
Assisted GPS is better than normal GPS and mainly helps the TTFF or Time To First Fix. Some pure GPS units that have a SiRF III chip, can take 30 seconds or more because it is dependent on your location, the amount of interference, and horizon information. It also takes a large number of satellite acquisitions because it doesn't know general location on cold start. So, in a large city, a full GPS system using SiRF III or anything like it will take longer than if you were out in the desert for example. Normal GPS also eats more power because of the constant acquisition of satellites ... and indoor use is limited.

aGPS takes information from the cell network to triangulate your general location from multiple towers. Since the phone has the GENERAL location from tower triangulation and other sources, it doesn't have to acquire as many satellites since it has most of the information it needs. It works better in doors because of an easier "fix" due to general location already determined by the cell network. And .... you also get better battery life because constant acquisition is not required.

Other than that ... aGPS and GPS are pretty much similar. Try it. Get a pure GPS unit and see how long it takes in-doors from a COLD START. Then get a known aGPS unit from a mobile phone and see how it works in the same in-door building. The aGPS will get a fix faster with few satellites ... well, if the pure GPS unit even makes it. LOL
That's perfect.

So does the bold have aGPS?
Yes. It would be foolish for them NOT to. They had battery drain issues with 3G, so their not going to use the most battery draining GPS type. THAT, and all of their units were aGPS.


Numetheus
The crazy Filipino!!

http://www.myspace.com/numetheus
PIN: 24259AA5
   
Reply With Quote
  (#9 (permalink)) Old
warpdryv Offline
New Member
 
Posts: 9
Join Date: Feb 2005
Model: 8800
Carrier: rogers
Default 07-10-2008, 04:43 PM

the fcc filings indicate aGPS.
   
Reply With Quote
  (#10 (permalink)) Old
Battery Offline
Thumbs Must Hurt
 
Battery's Avatar
 
Posts: 78
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Port Moody
Model: 9000
Carrier: Rogers
Default 07-10-2008, 06:32 PM

Quote:
Originally Posted by warpdryv View Post
the fcc filings indicate aGPS.
True

here is the link

https://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/prod/oet/f...e_or_pdf=pd f
   
Reply With Quote
  (#11 (permalink)) Old
MBW Offline
Talking BlackBerry Encyclopedia
 
MBW's Avatar
 
Posts: 348
Join Date: May 2008
Model: 8110
PIN: N/A
Carrier: AT&T
Default 07-10-2008, 08:19 PM

The Bold has GPS and WiFi and Bluetooth and 3G. It has twice as much handset memory. It has a faster CPU and superb graphics.

It does not have a wireless weather station, a warp field generator, subspace support, a direct brain interface, a bar code scanner, a fingerprint reader, a retinal scanner or full tricorder functions.

At least not yet.


/\/\\/\/
   
Reply With Quote
  (#12 (permalink)) Old
Outrigger Offline
Talking BlackBerry Encyclopedia
 
Outrigger's Avatar
 
Posts: 304
Join Date: Nov 2006
Model: 8820
Carrier: AT&T
Default 07-11-2008, 01:30 PM

Quote:
Originally Posted by MBW View Post
The Bold has GPS and WiFi and Bluetooth and 3G. It has twice as much handset memory. It has a faster CPU and superb graphics.

It does not have a wireless weather station, a warp field generator, subspace support, a direct brain interface, a bar code scanner, a fingerprint reader, a retinal scanner or full tricorder functions.

At least not yet.
but it doesn't mean it won't in the next version Here's hoping for a warp field generator.


AT&T - BlackBerry 8820
   
Reply With Quote
  (#13 (permalink)) Old
TheBigNewt Offline
CrackBerry Addict
 
TheBigNewt's Avatar
 
Posts: 966
Join Date: Oct 2006
Model: 8100
Carrier: Tmobile
Default 07-11-2008, 03:08 PM

Quote:
Originally Posted by MBW View Post
The Bold has GPS and WiFi and Bluetooth and 3G. It has twice as much handset memory. It has a faster CPU and superb graphics.

It does not have a wireless weather station, a warp field generator, subspace support, a direct brain interface, a bar code scanner, a fingerprint reader, a retinal scanner or full tricorder functions.

At least not yet.
I've seen merchants that have CC scanners attached to their smartphones for transactions and they can BT the receipt to a little printer for you.


BB 8100 Tmobile version 4.2.1.107 BIS
   
Reply With Quote
  (#14 (permalink)) Old
untjoker Offline
Talking BlackBerry Encyclopedia
 
untjoker's Avatar
 
Posts: 205
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Republic of Texas
Model: 8320
Carrier: T-mobile
Default 07-12-2008, 10:14 PM

Quote:
Originally Posted by Spamdumpster View Post
I could be wrong, but I though Assisted GPS meant that data receives over the network sped up the initial GPS lock.
You are correct. Assisted GPS is faster not only on initial lock, but in every aspect. The reason being it can get info from cell towers and WIFI, and I don't need to explain why it's a good thing to be able to read GPS data from the SAT through cell towers instead of waiting on a very, very slow connection from the SAT directly to the phone.......


Yes, I've been diagnosed with Phantom Vibration Disorder
   
Reply With Quote
  (#15 (permalink)) Old
MBW Offline
Talking BlackBerry Encyclopedia
 
MBW's Avatar
 
Posts: 348
Join Date: May 2008
Model: 8110
PIN: N/A
Carrier: AT&T
Default 07-13-2008, 09:52 AM

Fingerprint reading may not be too far off - though I doubt they'll build it in.

I think it might be a year or less when we'll be seeing a little bit of speaker-dependent pass-phrase recognition - not exactly a voice print but pretty damned good as biometric unlocks go.


/\/\\/\/
   
Reply With Quote
  (#16 (permalink)) Old
richard371 Offline
CrackBerry Addict
 
Posts: 893
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: San Francisco
Model: 8310
Carrier: ATT
Default 07-16-2008, 12:46 PM

The aGPS devices still pick up signals from the satellites? What happens if you are in the middle of the ocean?
   
Reply With Quote
  (#17 (permalink)) Old
MBW Offline
Talking BlackBerry Encyclopedia
 
MBW's Avatar
 
Posts: 348
Join Date: May 2008
Model: 8110
PIN: N/A
Carrier: AT&T
Default 07-16-2008, 12:53 PM

As long as you're on the surface of the ocean (assuming we can limit this discussion to Earth), GPS can see the satellites.

I wouldn't want to promise anything from in a submarine or while diving.

The cell tower signal is a different issue, of course.


/\/\\/\/
   
Reply With Quote
  (#18 (permalink)) Old
carlkra Offline
Knows Where the Search Button Is
 
Posts: 24
Join Date: Dec 2007
Model: 8100
PIN: N/A
Carrier: rogers
Default 07-22-2008, 11:50 AM

AGPS is a partnership between an always-on GPS receiver and assistance server on the tower and a scaled down GPS receiver on the handheld. The tower GPS will always have the current satellite constellation data ready and can pass it quickly to a nearby, just-powered-on cell phone to greatly speed up acquiring an accurate fix on the handheld. Hence you can power up a cell phone and immediately make a 911 call with location info.

Some AGPS receivers I have had in cell phones cannot function at all without cell tower support, and not all cell sites are yet so equipped. And obviously, such a limited receiver could not work away from cell service. I hope this is not the case for the Bold.

I am optimistic because I heard from someone who got the information from RIM tech support, that the 8800 GPS was capable of operating without cellular service (getting maps is another story).

The best of both worlds would be a mobile device GPS with full autonomous capability but also the capability to operate in assisted mode when the service was available. It would be great to get some real data on how the Bold's GPS operates.

Regards,

Carl
   
Reply With Quote
  (#19 (permalink)) Old
numetheus Offline
CrackBerry Addict
 
numetheus's Avatar
 
Posts: 531
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Mesa, AZ
Model: 8310
PIN: 24259AA5
Carrier: AT&T
Default 07-22-2008, 02:38 PM

Quote:
Originally Posted by carlkra View Post
AGPS is a partnership between an always-on GPS receiver and assistance server on the tower and a scaled down GPS receiver on the handheld. The tower GPS will always have the current satellite constellation data ready and can pass it quickly to a nearby, just-powered-on cell phone to greatly speed up acquiring an accurate fix on the handheld. Hence you can power up a cell phone and immediately make a 911 call with location info.

Some AGPS receivers I have had in cell phones cannot function at all without cell tower support, and not all cell sites are yet so equipped. And obviously, such a limited receiver could not work away from cell service. I hope this is not the case for the Bold.

I am optimistic because I heard from someone who got the information from RIM tech support, that the 8800 GPS was capable of operating without cellular service (getting maps is another story).

The best of both worlds would be a mobile device GPS with full autonomous capability but also the capability to operate in assisted mode when the service was available. It would be great to get some real data on how the Bold's GPS operates.

Regards,

Carl
Cell phone towers don't have to be equipped for anything! They don't have to have aGPS support. They use triangulation with multiple towers. As long as there are multiple connections a calculation can be made of general location. It works the same way you can triangulate location if you can connect to multiple WIFI access points. Access points do not have your so called aGPS capability, but can always be used in triangulation if you can get a signal.

Bold will have the same aGPS that is on the 8820 and the 8310.


Numetheus
The crazy Filipino!!

http://www.myspace.com/numetheus
PIN: 24259AA5
   
Reply With Quote
  (#20 (permalink)) Old
Mark Rejhon Offline
Retired BBF Moderator
 
Mark Rejhon's Avatar
 
Posts: 4,831
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
Model: 8310
Carrier: Rogers
Default 07-24-2008, 01:46 PM

Important:
"Assisted GPS" is not the same as "Antenna GPS".

Here's an article.
Quote:
Quote:
Assisted GPS > "true" GPS.
edit: The [BlackBerry] Bold has aGPS, as does the iPhone.
This is correct, but let's be clear there's some confusion:
Some people confuse "aGPS" as "Antenna GPS" versus "Assisted GPS".
Also you should call "true" GPS as "native-only GPS" because Assisted GPS is also true GPS. Some people call antenna triangulation as "Antenna GPS". This is incorrect. Sometimes people mix up "Antenna GPS" and "Assisted GPS" (The AGPS acronym) or make them the same thing. That is not true. One is true GPS and the other is not.
Let me clear up confusion with Plain English<tm>.
I'm writing this from scratch, here goes...
Quality Scale
OKAY: Antenna Triangulation or WiFi Location (Incorrectly called Antenna GPS)
GOOD: Native GPS
BETTER: Assisted GPS (except the Verizon type where you pay extra)
BEST: Assisted GPS with fallback to Native GPS and Antenna Triangulation
Lock Speed And Accuracy Scale
ANTENNA LOCATION - fast lock, less accurate, works indoors
WiFi LOCATION - fast lock, less accurate, works indoors
NATIVE GPS - slow lock, more accurate, outdoors only
ASSISTED GPS - medium-fast lock, more accurate, outdoors only
Difference between Native GPS and Assisted GPS
NATIVE GPS Can lock without phone reception, takes one minute to lock beca