BlackBerry Forums Support Community               

Closed Thread
 
LinkBack Thread Tools
Old 11-07-2009, 06:58 PM   #1 (permalink)
Knows Where the Search Button Is
 
F5fstop's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Southeastern Utah
Model: 9630
PIN: N/A
Carrier: Verizon
Posts: 43
Post Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Smile Tour vs. Nikon

Please Login to Remove!

Took some photos today when out and about with my 9630, and when I got home I decided to compare two of the photos against two almost identical photos, taken from the same area, with a Nikon D300, equipped with a F/2.8 28-70 AFS lens. The photos of the hoodoo were taken in the identical place, so I thought I would compare the GPS data from the phone to the Solmeta N2 GPS device on the Camera that loads GPS data directly into the EXIF file; similar to the 9630ís setup.

All photos were resized in Photoshop, and auto levels were applied in Capture NX2. Other than those two adjustments, no other adjustments were made.
BB:


D300:


BB:


D300:


In addition, note that since I am using a free subscription to Photobucket, the photos are compressed and this messes up all photo; but the comparison should hold since Photobucket messed up all four photos.
I also was curious about the GPS data, so here are two screen shots from Google:
This shot of Google shows the location of the BB, D300 and the Hoodoo (or rock formation from the first photos). (D300 is RED, BB is GREEN, and Hoodoo is BLUE.)


Zooming in on Google Earth and you can see there is a small distance separation from the two shots.


I would say the D300 is more accurate. I compared the D300 coordinates against a Garmin 60CSx and they were almost dead on. This does not mean the D300 and the Garmin are more accurate, but I would say since two agree and one does not, the D300 photo is probably closer to actual position than the BB.
I will say the photos are not that bad when compared against photos taken with a semi-professional camera, with a $1500.00 lens, so I am not complaining, just comparing.
I should also say I was able to send both of these photos to friends via Verizon, from right where they were taken. More than can be said for a friend with her iPhone, that was with me.

(And yes, it is a red desert)
__________________
Greetings from the Colorado 'High Desert' Plateau; Canyon Country, Utah
Offline  
Old 11-09-2009, 07:47 AM   #2 (permalink)
New Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Model: tour
PIN: N/A
Carrier: verizon
Posts: 13
Post Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default

Interesting. The bb photos are really pretty good. Obviously the Nikon photos are slightly sharper and more saturated. In addition, the bb photos seem slightly overexposed for my taste, in comparison with the dSLR. However, I'm really quite impressed with the bb photos.
Offline  
Old 11-09-2009, 03:55 PM   #3 (permalink)
Latino Hasta La Muerte
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Denville, NJ.
Model: 7250
OS: 4.1
PIN: G!!!
Carrier: Verizon
Posts: 9,039
Post Thanks: 51
Thanked 305 Times in 293 Posts
Default

If the BB didn't have time to hook up with satellites for the GPS it might degrade the accuracy. Kinda silly comparing the two though, no?
Offline  
Old 11-09-2009, 04:29 PM   #4 (permalink)
Knows Where the Search Button Is
 
F5fstop's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Southeastern Utah
Model: 9630
PIN: N/A
Carrier: Verizon
Posts: 43
Post Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default

I do not believe it was silly, but if you do, fine, don't read any further. I DID NOT start out on this trip to compare, I decided to do the comparison after I was home. More out of my curiosity, but thought others might find it interesting. Guess I was wrong.

I never expected the BB to have better photos, if it did, I would have thrown the Nikon off the nearest cliff, I guess I was just showing the differences, and considering the difference between the equipment, the BB's photos really are not that bad. The BB does not have a light sensor like the Nikon so the washed out effect from shooting in a desert is normal.

The following day, on a trip up to the mountains, the BBs color were more saturated, and not washed out. I won't show those since it would be too silly to do anymore comparisons. But I will say, out of the harsh desert sun, the BB was pretty darn good overall, but again not as good as the Nikon (as one would expect), but it would be silly to think the BB would be better.

I had also been comparing the track of the BB with the Garmin, so the sats were already locked on. However, I am not worrying about the slight difference since I do not believe the BB uses WAAS correction, while the Garmin does. If the BB was all you had, a person would not get lost.

No more silly comparisions....
__________________
Greetings from the Colorado 'High Desert' Plateau; Canyon Country, Utah
Offline  
Old 11-09-2009, 06:04 PM   #5 (permalink)
BlackBerry Master
 
Motorcycle Mama's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2008
Model: 9930
OS: 7.1.0.163
PIN: N/A
Carrier: Verizon
Posts: 4,351
Post Thanks: 0
Thanked 249 Times in 240 Posts
Default

Those are great. And the BlackBerry DID take remarkably good pictures.

The wide shot of the canyon taken with the D300 is stunning, though.
Offline  
Old 11-10-2009, 01:32 PM   #6 (permalink)
CrackBerry Addict
 
TeritaM's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: NYC
Model: Torch
Carrier: Island of Misfit Toys
Posts: 591
Post Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default

my BB took better shots than my nikon s230. I got rid of it (the camera).
Offline  
Closed Thread


Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On





Copyright © 2004-2014 BlackBerryForums.com.
The names RIM © and BlackBerry © are registered Trademarks of BlackBerry Inc.