BlackBerry Forums Support Community               

Closed Thread
 
LinkBack Thread Tools
Old 02-14-2007, 10:03 PM   #1 (permalink)
Knows Where the Search Button Is
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Los Angeles, California
Model: 8100
PIN: 23de34b6
Carrier: tmobile
Posts: 37
Post Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default why don't big customers want the camera feature?

Please Login to Remove!

i know this is probably the inappropriate place to post this thread, but i tried figuring this out myself with no luck.
i hear all this talk that the reason why blackberry doesnt design cameras on their phones is because the "big customers" don't want/like a camera feature. my cousin who is in the whole big business industry, saw my pearl and told me "its a good looking phone, but i don't like the camera."
my question is, why don't the "big customers" like this feature? whats wrong with a camera?
Offline  
Old 02-14-2007, 10:17 PM   #2 (permalink)
Thumbs Must Hurt
 
FLIPP_96's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Model: 8320
Carrier: TMO
Posts: 133
Post Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default

Its also the government. Cameras are bad for security.
Offline  
Old 02-14-2007, 10:19 PM   #3 (permalink)
Thumbs Must Hurt
 
nsimpson's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Vancouver BC Canada
Model: 8700
Carrier: Rogers
Posts: 186
Post Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default

camera's arent allowed on devices becuase of security reasons, pervy reasons and just cuz they dont like them.

The real reasons is the 1st one I gave. alot of people want to keep their internal info hush hush. RIMs biggest client is the US gov't and with the war on terror they dont want to give away anything to the enemy.
__________________
pin:204FE962
Offline  
Old 02-14-2007, 11:26 PM   #4 (permalink)
Talking BlackBerry Encyclopedia
 
Steve's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Cedar Falls, Iowa
Model: 9630
Carrier: Sprint
Posts: 490
Post Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default

Wirelessly posted (Cingular 8100 Pearl: BlackBerry8100/4.2.0 Profile/MIDP-2.0 Configuration/CLDC-1.1 VendorID/102)

Industrial espionage is real.

An example, Trade Secrets are to be kept secret to retain protection under certain trade secret laws. Because if you write a patent on something that was a trade secret, you no longer have those specific protections. You may have the patent for something, but others can eventually copy it.

Could someone email a photo of intellectual property in a manner of seconds? I think so. Security couldn't knock you down fast enough.

I wouldn't be allowed to snap a picture of something I'm working on and email it to myself. I'm on a personal BIS, not BES, so the photo would go right out the building so to speak.

Steve
__________________
9630 Tour - Sprint
Offline  
Old 02-15-2007, 05:16 AM   #5 (permalink)
No longer Registered.
 
greggebhardt's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Jacksonville, FLorida
Model: 9000!
PIN: NOT!
Carrier: AT&T
Posts: 3,762
Post Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default

Common sense would tell most that all of your employees having a camera in sensitive areas would be risky. If the company provides your Blackberry it is just more easy to say NO CAMERAS to be safe. This is not hard to figure out.
Offline  
Old 02-15-2007, 09:50 AM   #6 (permalink)
CrackBerry Addict
 
Andi's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Chicago
Model: 9700
OS: 6.0.0.448
Carrier: T-Mobile
Posts: 549
Post Thanks: 0
Thanked 4 Times in 4 Posts
Default

I support attorneys - no cameras allowed in courthouses
Offline  
Old 02-15-2007, 10:06 AM   #7 (permalink)
BlackBerry Mensa
 
takeshi's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Houston
Model: 8310
Carrier: at&t
Posts: 7,741
Post Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default

In the corporate world a lot of things aren't ok. Some make sense. Some don't (like SOX compliance) even their intent is good. Some apply across the board, some don't. I mean, not all companies have the same policies so it's not as simple as a universal "big businesses are not ok with cameras" rule. Some businesses really don't care. Some facilities have much tighter security restrictions than others. A lot of such companies and government entities rely on Blackberries and form a significant portion of RIM's customer base. The entities that do care need to have the option to deploy Blackberries without cameras.

Thankfully, RIM is offering a camera-equipped and a non-camera-equipped model in the 88XX family so it's really a moot point. Now, whether or not a given carrier will offer both is a separate matter...

Last edited by takeshi : 02-15-2007 at 10:21 AM.
Offline  
Old 02-15-2007, 10:23 AM   #8 (permalink)
No longer Registered.
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Model: 8700G
Posts: 555
Post Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Andi
I support attorneys - no cameras allowed in courthouses
Outside of governmental cases, let's get video out of it as well since it is not entertainment. No governmental case should be exempt from public viewing.
Offline  
Closed Thread


Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On





Copyright 2004-2014 BlackBerryForums.com.
The names RIM and BlackBerry are registered Trademarks of BlackBerry Inc.