my results
 

Cingular 7280; OS 4.0.0.185 Results

JBenchmark1: 727
Text: 96
2D Shapes: 208
3D Shapes: 139
Fill Rate: 44
Animation: 240

JBenchmark2: 17
Image Manipulation: 18
Text: 60
Sprites: 6
3D Transformation: 7
User Interface: 28

*edit* How does one delete those 2 apps from Blackberry? Desktop Manager can't remove it as it doesn't "see" the software I just installed.
Thanks.

Cingular 7290 OS 4.0.0.198
BES 4.0 Hotfix 1

JBenchmark1: 818
JBenchmark2: 17

7230

JBenchmark 1: 677
text: 91
2D Shapes: 209
3D Shapes: 126
Fill Rate: 37
Animation: 214


JBenchmark 2: 12
Image Manipulation: 5
Text: 5
Sprites: 6
3D Transformation: 5
User Interface: 21

Updated main post to reflect all results reported so far.

The TurtleBerry 7750 establishes itself again as the true TurtleBerry.
What a slow model the 7750 is! The new 7250 is a whopping 5 times faster than 7750 in JBenchMark2!

Unfortunately, the GSM/GPRS 7290 is only half the speed as the CDMA 7250! This indicates it's probably not using the same chip...

Model: 7750
Carrier: Verizon
BES: Yes

JBenchmark 1: 225
Text: 44
2D: 64
3D: 40
Fill: 3
Animation: 74

JBenchmark 2: 7
Image manipulation: 4
Text: 26
Sprintes: 3
3d: 2
User Int: 14

Mark, I agree, the 7290 must not be using the same chip or it is not running at the same clock speed. I noticed on the ARM9 processor specifications that their are two versions of the core, one at .13micron and one at .18 micron. The former has a minimum speed of 250MHz and the latter 200MHz. Could be they use different cores depending on when the chip set was made? Alternatively, they may use a different chip set alltogether.

Okay, now how do I uninstall these benckmarks icons?

Options->Applications

I find it interesting at the range I can get with the benchmark.

7280 4.0.0.185 Cingular w/ 4.0 BES

From 699 - 767

BB 7290 Cingular running Roger's Beta v4.0

JBenchmark1: 816

Details:
Text: 112
2D Shapes: 222
3D Shapes: 157
Fill Rate: 47
Animation: 278

JBenchmark2: 18

Details:
Image manipulation: 14
Text: 76
Sprites: 8
3D Transforms: 6
User Interface: 31

THANK YOU!

Benchmark 2 seems the more reliable and dependable with the smallest range of results. I would tend to trust it as a better indicator of real performance. Any thoughts?

7100g
Cingular (with myblueberry.us service)
OS v4.0.0.198

Jbenchmark 1: 697
Details:
Text:129
2D shapes: 192
3D shapes: 112
Fill Rate: 28
Animation: 236

Jbenchmark 2: 16
Details:
Image Manipulation: 9
Text: 68
Sprites: 8
3D Transform: 6
User Interface: 31

7780 - Rogers (AT&T OS V4.0.0.185)

JBenchmark 1 = 540
JBenchmark 2 = 14

7290 on Cingular

OS 3.8.0.139

#1 706


#2 Got Error message "uncaught exception, multiple change, listeners not allowed"

UPDATED


I just upgraded to OS version 4.0.0.198

7290
4.0.0.198
Cingular


Test #1
1st Run- 578
2nd Run- 757
3rd Run- 785
Test #2
1st Run- 17
2nd Run- 17
3rd Run- 17

Model 7280
Rogers
OS 4.0.0.171

Jbenchmark2: 17
Image manipulation: 16
text: 51
Sprites: 7
3d PLatform: 7
User Interface: 28

Jbenchmark: 747
Text: 132
2d Shapes: 207
3d shapes: 138
Fill rate: 41
Animation: 229

Model 7290
Rogers
3.8

Jbench mark: 761

Details
Test: 121
2d shapes: 204
3d shapes: 142
Fill Rate: 44
Animation: 250

Test 2 :
Uncaught exception: multichange listeners not allowed

gonna upgrade.. brb

BlackBerry 7230 (not using BES)

OS 4.0.0.185 With T-Mobile

JBenchmark 1: 748

Details:
Text: 124
2D Shapes: 212
3D Shapes: 140
Fill Rate: 46
Animation: 226

JBenchmark 2: 17
image Manipulation: 16
Text: 66
Sprites: 7
3D Transform: 7
User Interface: 25

Bell Bell Bell
 

Blackberry 7250

OS 4.0.0.204 with BELL MOBILITY (non BES)

JBenchmark 1: Error downloading - 907 Invalid JAR

JBenchmark 2: 32

image Manipulation: 35
Text: 97
Sprites: 13
3D Transform: 18
User Interface: 37