Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Spamdumpster QUESTION: Is there any possibility that loading another carrier's OS could result in connection issues? I strongly doubt it, but I'm not 100 percent sure. |
Yes, it's 100% possible that loading another carrier's OS onto your handheld could cause issues with network reception. It really just depends. The OS itself is not the issue, it's the platform/radio code. Cingular could have implemented a change to the radio code that would affect only that particular tower, to be perfectly honest.
If you want the advantages of a new OS update but retain the platform/radio code for the Cingular network, then take the rim7130g.sfi from the \GPRS folder of the Cingular OS and copy it to the \GPRS folder of the other carrier's OS. It will likely tell you that it's downgrading the System Software when you open Application Loader.
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Spamdumpster QUESTION: Why are CS reps force you to try things you've already done to troubleshoot a problem. Is there anyone that would claim they've tried something (battery pull, toggle on/of wireless, etc.) that they didn't really try. This makes my CS calls for lots of technology take 10 times longer than they have to. |
They are paid to do their job as they were trained and according to script. These days, more than 75% of the time when you call into first tier support with pretty much anyone, be it a carrier (T-Mobile, Cingular, etc) or an ISP (EarthLink, AOL, etc) or anyone with an inbound/outbound call center, you're not talking to someone who's physically employed by that entity. Instead, they are outsourced call centers, be it in America or India or Mexico, that handle low-level support calls. These are effective in the sense that they follow a script, to the tee, and escalate to higher level support specialists (who are employed by the entity) only when their efforts have been exhausted. The costs of these outsourced companies are VASTLY cheaper than hiring and training and offering benefits to an actual employee (in the case of India or Mexico call centers, the cost benefits are astronomically different). In most cases, if a call was escalated to higher levels of support, in spite of the fact that the issue could/should have been resolved by the outsourced agent, then the company who does the first level support could be penalized. Also, there are financial benefits for the outsourced company as well, in terms of minutes to bill the other entity, resolutions provided to the entity w/o escalation, etc.
Is this bad for the customer? Depends on how you look at it. On one hand, your overall experience could be hindered (Verizon, anyone?), but on the other hand, more money for the provider/carrier could mean more money to spend making the services they offer or their networks better.
Like it or not, outsourcing low-level jobs to resolve issues involving costs for training, insurance and benefits, salaries, etc. is the way of the world these days.