BlackBerry Forums Support Community
              

Closed Thread
 
Thread Tools
Old 09-21-2006, 12:25 PM   #1
SmokinV10
Knows Where the Search Button Is
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Menlo Park, CA
Model: 8800
Carrier: AT&T
Posts: 41
Default TMobile in the SF Bay Area

Please Login to Remove!

Im a Cingular 8700C user right now. Im thinking of switching to TMobile so I can get a discounted Pearl. Service here in Houston right now is great with Tmobile (so I hear), But Im skittish about how service is in the SF Bay Area. Im moving there in the next month or so and have heard horror stories about Tmobile service there. Can Tmobile users chime in on the reality of Tmobile service in the Bay Area?
Offline  
Old 09-21-2006, 01:03 PM   #2
CaptainIndignant
New Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Model: 8100
Carrier: T-Mobile
Posts: 13
Default

TMO's service in SF proper is, indeed, drastically inferior to Cingular's. In the Bay Area as a whole, I don't know that there's a noticable difference. And part of why TMO in SF is so terrible is that all cell service in SF is fairly terrible, due perhaps to the terrain. But TMO is definitely much worse than the other big carriers.

(Full disclosure: I lived in SF for a couple of years, but moved away a year ago and have only spent a few weeks there in the last year, so there may have been improvement.)
Offline  
Old 09-21-2006, 01:40 PM   #3
SmokinV10
Knows Where the Search Button Is
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Menlo Park, CA
Model: 8800
Carrier: AT&T
Posts: 41
Default

I have cingular right now and noticed that their service in the Bay area stinks compared with some other major metropolitan areas. I am just wondering if it is so terrible that I wont be able to handle having Tmobile as a carrier there.
Offline  
Old 09-21-2006, 02:08 PM   #4
SaV
Knows Where the Search Button Is
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Model: 8100
Carrier: t-mobile
Posts: 31
Default

I have perfect reception with T-Mo.

<~~SF native
Offline  
Old 09-21-2006, 03:53 PM   #5
dwc
Talking BlackBerry Encyclopedia
 
dwc's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: SF CA
Model: 8320
Carrier: tmob
Posts: 204
Default

I'm in SF and my reception is fine. I lose signal driving along the coast in the presidio, but otherwise no complaints.
Offline  
Old 09-21-2006, 05:10 PM   #6
pcm2
Thumbs Must Hurt
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Model: 8120
Carrier: T-Mobile USA
Posts: 51
Default

I'm in SF and reception is pretty good. My only complaint is dead spots. I've noticed mysterious blackout zones where there should be none ... like around 19th-21st Street and Mission, a major thoroughfare.

But like CaptainIndignant says, cell phone service in SF is a little notorious. T-Mobile probably has the least developed network, but none of them are really great here. Prior to going with T-Mobile (maybe two years ago now) my phone was on Sprint and it truly sucked. My outgoing voicemail message told people to call me at home -- because when I was at home I got zero bars, so the cell was useless to me as a primary phone number. If you were driving in a car, also, you could expect to lose your call as you changed neighborhoods. My T-Mobile BlackBerry 7100t was the first phone that got me consistent enough reception to hand out the number. I think the 8100 might actually have even slightly better reception.

Incidentally, one of the reasons for poor reception in SF is due to SF's typical negative attitude to any form of development, and cell phones in particular. The folks who shop at vegan groceries and go to Burning Man are also generally very negative toward cell phone use (even though they all have them; they just hate to see anyone else with them). They also have very much a "not in my backyard" attitude to development. The result is that, any time one of the major cell phone providers wants to build out extra capacity, the local neighborhood association gets together and lobbies to block it, citing evil radiation/cancer threats etc. The result? Crap cell phone reception. I'm not making this up -- things may have changed more recently, but here's an older article: Resistance Mounts to Cell Phone Antennas
Offline  
Old 09-21-2006, 05:24 PM   #7
pcm2
Thumbs Must Hurt
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Model: 8120
Carrier: T-Mobile USA
Posts: 51
Default

Ah, here we go ... folks are still at it as of last month: S.F. residents ask governor to veto cell phone tower bill - Examiner.com
Offline  
Old 09-21-2006, 05:46 PM   #8
SaV
Knows Where the Search Button Is
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Model: 8100
Carrier: t-mobile
Posts: 31
Default

Ahhh...

....I love the City!

=D
Offline  
Closed Thread



Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


4 Count Case GE ProLine 2 Bulb 120V T12 Electronic Fluorescent Light Ballasts picture

4 Count Case GE ProLine 2 Bulb 120V T12 Electronic Fluorescent Light Ballasts

$49.99



10-Count GE Fluorescent Ballast, GE432-MVPS-L Electronic T8, 120v to 277v picture

10-Count GE Fluorescent Ballast, GE432-MVPS-L Electronic T8, 120v to 277v

$108.99



Philips ADVANCE AmbiStar RELB-2S40-N Replacement Ballast 40-Watt 2-Lamp T12 picture

Philips ADVANCE AmbiStar RELB-2S40-N Replacement Ballast 40-Watt 2-Lamp T12

$18.79



Workhorse Solid State Electronic Lamp Ballast - ‎WH2-120-C picture

Workhorse Solid State Electronic Lamp Ballast - ‎WH2-120-C

$24.99



Ballast Box 3 Point Hitch Counterweight for Cat 1 Category 1 Tractor 800lb Green picture

Ballast Box 3 Point Hitch Counterweight for Cat 1 Category 1 Tractor 800lb Green

$192.99



QHE 4X32T8/UNV ISH-SC Sylvania 51347 4-Lamp T8 Instant Start Fluorescent Ballast picture

QHE 4X32T8/UNV ISH-SC Sylvania 51347 4-Lamp T8 Instant Start Fluorescent Ballast

$10.79







Copyright © 2004-2016 BlackBerryForums.com.
The names RIM © and BlackBerry © are registered Trademarks of BlackBerry Inc.