BlackBerry Forums Support Community
              

Closed Thread
 
Thread Tools
Old 05-29-2009, 01:19 PM   #21
dmead
BlackBerry Extraordinaire
 
dmead's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: The OC
Model: EVO
OS: COBOL
PIN: the tail on the donkey!
Carrier: Sprint
Posts: 1,199
Default

Please Login to Remove!

I am not up on foreign policy but wouldn't bombing N. Korea start us on the path to WW3?

Seems to me that if we started that then China would get involved and all hell would break loose.
Offline  
Old 05-29-2009, 01:51 PM   #22
test54
BlackBerry Master
 
test54's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Austin, TX
Model: AAPL
OS: iPhone
Carrier: is Better than BB :)
Posts: 3,633
Default

To me I think they don't really care what happens to North Korea as long as it doesn't mean waves of refugees coming into China. There are some ties between them but they would not commit they did in the Korean War. Their best situation at this point is to keep things as-is.
__________________
"A computer lets you make more mistakes faster than any invention in human history - with the possible exceptions of handguns and tequila." - unknown
Offline  
Old 05-29-2009, 03:13 PM   #23
ezrunner
EPIC MOD
 
ezrunner's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Virginia Beach
Model: ZED10
OS: DOS 3.1
PIN: INK STICK
Carrier: Tmobile
Posts: 12,214
Default

Wirelessly posted (overwhelmingly stressed)

Truthfully this situation is best handled by china! China has gained a great deal from working with the west and likely doesn't wish to lose that. China has the ability to choke NK by cutting off its trade with NK.

China is probably the best suited for dealing with this potential crisis!

War sux anyone who has witnessed its carnage first hand knows it is very unpleasant we shouls avoid it if at all possible! The US armed forces are already spread way to thin
__________________
ZED 10
Offline  
Old 05-29-2009, 07:42 PM   #24
Dawg
No longer Registered.
 
Dawg's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Atlanta
Model: 8330
OS: 4.5.0.138
PIN: 31a6c9c9
Carrier: Verizon BIS
Posts: 13,962
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by djm2 View Post
That is so typical of your approach to logic. Pathetic.
aww you think I am pathetic how sweet. I could care less what you think either. Glad Test has you to defend his honor.
Offline  
Old 05-29-2009, 10:21 PM   #25
test54
BlackBerry Master
 
test54's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Austin, TX
Model: AAPL
OS: iPhone
Carrier: is Better than BB :)
Posts: 3,633
Default

EZ, I agree that China is in the best position to deal with the North Koreans. I also agree that China does not want to hurt their business relations with the world. I think the international pressure on China will build and they along with the US will work to ease the tension.
__________________
"A computer lets you make more mistakes faster than any invention in human history - with the possible exceptions of handguns and tequila." - unknown
Offline  
Old 05-30-2009, 05:38 AM   #26
mriff
BlackBerry Mensa
 
mriff's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Florida swamps
Model: iPhon
OS: 4.0.4
PIN: High
Carrier: Verizon
Posts: 7,273
Default

I hope you're right. But China's track record of influencing behavior of North Korea's leaders is pretty spotty. We'll see.
__________________
Ignorance more frequently begets confidence than does knowledge. CD
Offline  
Old 05-30-2009, 07:52 AM   #27
Dawg
No longer Registered.
 
Dawg's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Atlanta
Model: 8330
OS: 4.5.0.138
PIN: 31a6c9c9
Carrier: Verizon BIS
Posts: 13,962
Default

I dont see china doing anything.
Offline  
Old 05-30-2009, 10:36 PM   #28
rjw3000
BlackBerry Extraordinaire
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Model: Charm
OS: 2.1
Carrier: T-Mobile
Posts: 1,071
Default

Let China handle it, this is in their back yard. They want to be big boys, this is their chance to prove it. China still needs the outside world way more than the outside world needs them.
Offline  
Old 05-31-2009, 12:17 PM   #29
LunkHead
BlackBerry God
 
LunkHead's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Cardboard box
Model: 850
OS: 0.0.00001
PIN: kie swear
Carrier: USPS Priority
Posts: 11,203
Default

Let China deal with it? I think NOT!

Let China decide If NK gets nukes that can reach the US?

Ummmmmmmmm, no thanks! Are we to the point of a hug and kisses nation that we are willing to rest our future on China putting a stop to a rogue nation getting nukes that can reach out and touch us?

I say NO THANKS!

We and we alone have an interest in defending our nation.... China could care less if we are gone tomorrow... As a matter of fact, I am sure China would be pleased if our nation was gone tomorrow....

Kris

Last edited by LunkHead; 05-31-2009 at 12:20 PM..
Offline  
Old 05-31-2009, 12:27 PM   #30
LunkHead
BlackBerry God
 
LunkHead's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Cardboard box
Model: 850
OS: 0.0.00001
PIN: kie swear
Carrier: USPS Priority
Posts: 11,203
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by ezrunner View Post
Wirelessly posted (overwhelmingly stressed)

War sux anyone who has witnessed its carnage first hand knows it is very unpleasant we shouls avoid it if at all possible! The US armed forces are already spread way to thin
A ground invasion is not really needed at this point... Bomb the nuclear production facilities and be done with it. Naval ships, submarines and air bombers can be used...

I doubt they are dumb enough to invade SK but if they are then I am sure China would have a serious interest in getting them back out of SK..

My .02

Kris
Offline  
Old 05-31-2009, 01:25 PM   #31
test54
BlackBerry Master
 
test54's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Austin, TX
Model: AAPL
OS: iPhone
Carrier: is Better than BB :)
Posts: 3,633
Default

perhaps you think the NK people are not capable of building underground facilities?

China can and should deal with this. Its not 1950 where China is the enemy, they are a huge business partner with the world and will protect their business interests.
__________________
"A computer lets you make more mistakes faster than any invention in human history - with the possible exceptions of handguns and tequila." - unknown
Offline  
Old 05-31-2009, 01:48 PM   #32
LunkHead
BlackBerry God
 
LunkHead's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Cardboard box
Model: 850
OS: 0.0.00001
PIN: kie swear
Carrier: USPS Priority
Posts: 11,203
Default

If China is so worried about world opinion / pressure then why o why is there still massive human rights violations in that nation?

China will look out for it's own interests and could care less about defending the USA from attack.....

Underground facilities you say? Sure there is a solution, it's called a bunker bomb.... Do you think we don't know where they are? If you do, I'd disagree....

Kris

Last edited by LunkHead; 05-31-2009 at 01:49 PM..
Offline  
Old 05-31-2009, 09:42 PM   #33
test54
BlackBerry Master
 
test54's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Austin, TX
Model: AAPL
OS: iPhone
Carrier: is Better than BB :)
Posts: 3,633
Default

I guess the core difference is that I feel the US Military cannot & should not have to solve all problems. Their are better ways to handle many situations, this being one of those.
__________________
"A computer lets you make more mistakes faster than any invention in human history - with the possible exceptions of handguns and tequila." - unknown
Offline  
Old 06-01-2009, 05:04 AM   #34
Dawg
No longer Registered.
 
Dawg's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Atlanta
Model: 8330
OS: 4.5.0.138
PIN: 31a6c9c9
Carrier: Verizon BIS
Posts: 13,962
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by LunkHead View Post
If China is so worried about world opinion / pressure then why o why is there still massive human rights violations in that nation?

China will look out for it's own interests and could care less about defending the USA from attack.....

Underground facilities you say? Sure there is a solution, it's called a bunker bomb.... Do you think we don't know where they are? If you do, I'd disagree....

Kris
You see Kris this is why I would rather not discuss war with Test. He is a world hugger. He forgets the military is for this use to protect our interests.
Offline  
Old 06-01-2009, 08:25 AM   #35
kathrynhr
BlackBerry Extraordinaire
 
kathrynhr's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Ohio
Model: Dr01d
Carrier: Veri$on
Posts: 2,066
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Dawg View Post
You see Kris this is why I would rather not discuss war with Test. He is a world hugger. He forgets the military is for this use to protect our interests.
That's what it is being used for at present. Its original purpose was to protect our citizens and our rights, not the economic interests of the rich.
Offline  
Old 06-01-2009, 08:47 AM   #36
LunkHead
BlackBerry God
 
LunkHead's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Cardboard box
Model: 850
OS: 0.0.00001
PIN: kie swear
Carrier: USPS Priority
Posts: 11,203
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Dawg View Post
You see Kris this is why I would rather not discuss war with Test. He is a world hugger. He forgets the military is for this use to protect our interests.
I take most of test's political comments as communist based / opinionated. There are plenty of communist thinking people in our nation and I am not trying to slam or attack test. Just an observation on my part.

If anyone thinks that China is going to look out for the best interests of the US they are wrong.

Political and economic pressure has been tired with NK for years in reference to the nukes. These tactics have obviously failed as we continue to visit the same issue with them over and over again.

Do we really want the likes of NK having nukes? I don't!

When does diplomacy fail (we have tried for years to deal nice like with NK) and when do we take the actions needed to protect our nation when diplomacy has failed?

Invasion / ground war is NOT needed as I stated above. We know where the production plants are, we know where the storage facilities are... Bombs away. I think they will either get the hint or act a fool. Could they invade SK? Sure they could as we don't have the forces to stop it. However, I am fairly positive that China wants no part in NK taking the south. This and this alone would cause China to react, not the defense of the USA.

Kris

Last edited by LunkHead; 06-01-2009 at 08:48 AM..
Offline  
Old 06-01-2009, 08:51 AM   #37
test54
BlackBerry Master
 
test54's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Austin, TX
Model: AAPL
OS: iPhone
Carrier: is Better than BB :)
Posts: 3,633
Default

I'll bite - please find something Communist in anything I have said. Please....

I know some here do not even know what it means so I will await an answer.
__________________
"A computer lets you make more mistakes faster than any invention in human history - with the possible exceptions of handguns and tequila." - unknown
Offline  
Old 06-01-2009, 09:04 AM   #38
LunkHead
BlackBerry God
 
LunkHead's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Cardboard box
Model: 850
OS: 0.0.00001
PIN: kie swear
Carrier: USPS Priority
Posts: 11,203
Default

Good reading straight from the Communist Party USA website ....

http://www.cpusa.org/

Sounds allot like your statements test.... Again, please do not take this as an attack or a slam on you as it is not!

Again I say, when does diplomacy fail and action get taken? How long do we wait before taking action? Do we wait until it's too late and they have the power to reach out and touch us?

Diplomacy has failed in this instance.... It has been tried for years on end with no solution or change to the issue....

Kris

Last edited by LunkHead; 06-01-2009 at 09:06 AM..
Offline  
Old 06-01-2009, 09:13 AM   #39
test54
BlackBerry Master
 
test54's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Austin, TX
Model: AAPL
OS: iPhone
Carrier: is Better than BB :)
Posts: 3,633
Default

Lunk, your attempts to call me a Communist and then to say its not a slam or insult are funny at best. Still I see you have put none of my statements up as being communist but still insist continuing.

And again I say this situation needs to be resolved through diplomacy because it cannot / should not be solved militarily. To think that air strikes alone can solve the problem is ignorant. The best case scenario would still have special forces in to scout out the targets. Somewhat like the Israelis did in Syria. But guess what, the Syrians rebuilt and so would the North Koreans. And no there are not big enough bunker-busters to reach the deepest bunkers / underground facilities. Just look at Tora Bora, if we had a bomb to do it we would have used it.
__________________
"A computer lets you make more mistakes faster than any invention in human history - with the possible exceptions of handguns and tequila." - unknown

Last edited by test54; 06-01-2009 at 09:20 AM..
Offline  
Old 06-01-2009, 11:05 AM   #40
LunkHead
BlackBerry God
 
LunkHead's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Cardboard box
Model: 850
OS: 0.0.00001
PIN: kie swear
Carrier: USPS Priority
Posts: 11,203
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by test54 View Post
And again I say this situation needs to be resolved through diplomacy because it cannot / should not be solved militarily. To think that air strikes alone can solve the problem is ignorant. The best case scenario would still have special forces in to scout out the targets. Somewhat like the Israelis did in Syria. But guess what, the Syrians rebuilt and so would the North Koreans. And no there are not big enough bunker-busters to reach the deepest bunkers / underground facilities. Just look at Tora Bora, if we had a bomb to do it we would have used it.
Its thinking like that will lead this country to its demise... If we continue to hug them, they will continue to build em, until they have achieved their goal. Once they get nukes that can reach the US its wide open for them to demand / threaten / and extort our nation... And they will do it...

If you want WW3, let NK get nukes and see where it leads us....

As to your point of having SF scout targets, yeehaw! We agree on that. As to the claim that they will rebuild, let them... We have plenty of bombs and can play their cat and mouse game for as long as they desire to act like fools...

You would believe that it can be resolved with diplomacy... How long has diplomacy been used and failed with NK? A long, long time... While we hug them they continue on with their goals / mission...

All more diplomacy does at this point is buying them more time... It has been tried and it has failed. For diplomacy to work you must be dealing with rational people... The NK leadership has proven this it is not...

Kris

Last edited by LunkHead; 06-01-2009 at 11:07 AM..
Offline  
Closed Thread



Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


27 pieces Transistor p/n 2N3565  Semiconductor Technology Inc  New picture

27 pieces Transistor p/n 2N3565 Semiconductor Technology Inc New

$168.03



Peak, Atlas DCA55 Semiconductor Tester,  picture

Peak, Atlas DCA55 Semiconductor Tester,

$97.99



5 pieces Semiconductor Device p/n 1N140  New  picture

5 pieces Semiconductor Device p/n 1N140 New

$105.22



Littelfuse Psr033fs1600z Semiconductor Fuse, Psr Series, 1600A, Very Fast picture

Littelfuse Psr033fs1600z Semiconductor Fuse, Psr Series, 1600A, Very Fast

$243.99



3 pieces Semiconductor Device p/n 2710033  New picture

3 pieces Semiconductor Device p/n 2710033 New

$160.07



6 pieces EDI semiconductor device Diode p/n ED8790  htf New  picture

6 pieces EDI semiconductor device Diode p/n ED8790 htf New

$82.43







Copyright © 2004-2016 BlackBerryForums.com.
The names RIM © and BlackBerry © are registered Trademarks of BlackBerry Inc.