BlackBerry Forums Support Community
              

Closed Thread
 
Thread Tools
Old 03-23-2007, 05:15 AM   #1
greggebhardt
No longer Registered.
 
greggebhardt's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Jacksonville, FLorida
Model: 9000!
PIN: NOT!
Carrier: AT&T
Posts: 3,762
Default The only important question is

Please Login to Remove!

All this talk, the only important question we are waiting to have ansered is:


WHEN!
Offline  
Old 03-23-2007, 07:51 AM   #2
ezrunner
EPIC MOD
 
ezrunner's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Virginia Beach
Model: ZED10
OS: DOS 3.1
PIN: INK STICK
Carrier: Tmobile
Posts: 12,214
Default

indeed RIM WHEN?
__________________
ZED 10
Offline  
Old 03-23-2007, 08:42 AM   #3
sonic117
Thumbs Must Hurt
 
sonic117's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Queens, NYC
Model: 8300
PIN: 2404D7A1
Carrier: AT&T
Posts: 93
Default

yes please let us know.. im already holding off on the 8800 which i was really excited about just for this!
__________________
Proud owner of the BlackBerry 8300 for AT&T
Offline  
Old 03-23-2007, 09:25 AM   #4
holywarrior74
Thumbs Must Hurt
 
holywarrior74's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Los Angeles, CA
Model: 8100
Carrier: Tmobile
Posts: 71
Default

That's the only question I need answered right now, no doubt
__________________


Praise GOD in all his ways
BB 8100 Pearl
Pin 23DE8558
Offline  
Old 03-23-2007, 09:34 AM   #5
brucejr
BlackBerry Master
 
brucejr's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Model: 666
Carrier: ?
Posts: 3,645
Default

My Kingdom for an answer!!
__________________
The Purrfect 4
Offline  
Old 03-23-2007, 02:35 PM   #6
RLFore
Knows Where the Search Button Is
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: San Francisco
Model: 8100
Carrier: T-Mobile
Posts: 17
Default

A little T-Mo bird whispered to me early May
Offline  
Old 03-24-2007, 08:34 AM   #7
archer6
BlackBerry Extraordinaire
 
archer6's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: California, USA
Model: 8310
Carrier: at&t
Posts: 1,105
Default

Wirelessly posted (BlackBerry7130/4.1.0 Profile/MIDP-2.0 Configuration/CLDC-1.1 VendorID/102)

Some people held off when the 8800 was released, and suddenly in a matter of days news arrived of the 8300. Perhaps if I pass on the 8300 that will accellerate the intro of the 9xxx Series....
__________________
My All Time Favorite: _RED-8310_ Backups: 7130c, 8100, O2 8300, at&t 8300, 8700c, 8800, 8820
Offline  
Old 03-24-2007, 09:48 AM   #8
mjbanks
Talking BlackBerry Encyclopedia
 
mjbanks's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Saratoga Springs, NY
Model: 9000
Carrier: AT&T
Posts: 233
Default

I'm waiting for the 83xx (Papa Bear) that has wifi and gps. I was going to switch to Cingular/AT&T to get one (with Verizon now), so whenever they get it, I'll probably switch
Offline  
Old 03-24-2007, 10:03 AM   #9
wayneholbrook
Talking BlackBerry Encyclopedia
 
wayneholbrook's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Miami Florida
Model: 9000
PIN: 20D214AB
Carrier: AT&T
Posts: 282
Default

I thought BG said 3 or 4 weeks, and that was a few days ago, not like im counting.............
__________________
An army of asses led by a lion is vastly superior to an army of lions led by an ass.
Offline  
Old 03-24-2007, 10:27 AM   #10
jgoldenb
Thumbs Must Hurt
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Model: 8700
Carrier: rogers
Posts: 114
Default

my Rogers dealer told me yesterday that they put the 8300 into production early by accident....that it wasnt supposed to come out so soon after the 8800....this doesnt make a lot of sense to me....at the same time, it explains why its coming out so soon after the 8800....but even if it is true, why wouldnt they hold back the produced 8300's to sell more 8800s?
Offline  
Old 03-24-2007, 11:16 AM   #11
tdawg00
Talking BlackBerry Encyclopedia
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Houston
Model: 8900
PIN: 24aa7bfa
Carrier: Tmobile
Posts: 325
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by jgoldenb
my Rogers dealer told me yesterday that they put the 8300 into production early by accident....that it wasnt supposed to come out so soon after the 8800....this doesnt make a lot of sense to me....at the same time, it explains why its coming out so soon after the 8800....but even if it is true, why wouldnt they hold back the produced 8300's to sell more 8800s?
Well thats poor micro management.. How do you put thousands of units into production by accident???
Offline  
Old 03-24-2007, 01:38 PM   #12
bucketmouth
Thumbs Must Hurt
 
bucketmouth's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Ocean City, MD
Model: 9530
Carrier: verizon 5.0.0.xxx
Posts: 182
Default

wow...if thats true...do we want to buy products made by idiots
__________________
Chicks dig me, because I rarely wear underwear and when I do it's usually something unusual. "Bill Murray-Stripes"
Offline  
Old 03-24-2007, 01:58 PM   #13
Fungineer
Thumbs Must Hurt
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: :noitacoL
Model: 8100
Carrier: T-Mobile
Posts: 107
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by jgoldenb
my Rogers dealer told me yesterday that they put the 8300 into production early by accident....that it wasnt supposed to come out so soon after the 8800....this doesnt make a lot of sense to me....at the same time, it explains why its coming out so soon after the 8800....but even if it is true, why wouldnt they hold back the produced 8300's to sell more 8800s?
Your Rogers dealer is an idiot. Let's say that each handheld costs RIM $250 to make (considering that's what a carrier might sell it at with a contract that's probably not far off the mark), and RIM needs to build say 250,000 units for a launch on multiple carriers simultaneously (even with one carrier like Cingular, I'd expect at least 100K of units in stores for launch day) - that's means that RIM "accidentally" spent $62.5M to build units... yeah right.

Some people don't understand why RIM would sell both the 8800 and 8300 simultaneously - well, they're for different markets, and likely will be for different prices. The 8800 is clearly RIM's response to the MotoQ and Nokia E6x series of products and is aimed at business folks, whereas both the 8100 and 8300 are targeting consumers - it may seem silly for enterprise people who own a 7290 or 8700 for there to be two QWERTY BBs launched within a few months of each other, but these aren't just meant to be upgrade units - they're meant to attract current Treo or HTC or Sidekick users who have purchased these for individual use versus corporate use. I see this as less "poor micro management" on RIM's part and more of a big, big push on their part to get a larger slice of the mobile user pie. And looking at their ever-growing subscriber numbers it seems to be working.
Offline  
Old 03-24-2007, 05:05 PM   #14
greggebhardt
No longer Registered.
 
greggebhardt's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Jacksonville, FLorida
Model: 9000!
PIN: NOT!
Carrier: AT&T
Posts: 3,762
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by jgoldenb
my Rogers dealer told me yesterday that they put the 8300 into production early by accident....that it wasnt supposed to come out so soon after the 8800....this doesnt make a lot of sense to me....at the same time, it explains why its coming out so soon after the 8800....but even if it is true, why wouldnt they hold back the produced 8300's to sell more 8800s?
An accident? Either you or your Rogers dealer is crazy. A company like RIM does not accidently put something like the 8300 into production. You should have slapped your Rogers Dealer for saying something so stupid!
Offline  
Old 03-24-2007, 05:50 PM   #15
jgoldenb
Thumbs Must Hurt
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Model: 8700
Carrier: rogers
Posts: 114
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by greggebhardt
An accident? Either you or your Rogers dealer is crazy. A company like RIM does not accidently put something like the 8300 into production. You should have slapped your Rogers Dealer for saying something so stupid!

i guess you didnt read where i said that what he said didnt make much sense...PM me your address and ill come slap you for calling me crazy
Offline  
Old 03-24-2007, 06:18 PM   #16
archer6
BlackBerry Extraordinaire
 
archer6's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: California, USA
Model: 8310
Carrier: at&t
Posts: 1,105
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by jgoldenb
my Rogers dealer told me yesterday that they put the 8300 into production early by accident....that it wasnt supposed to come out so soon after the 8800....this doesnt make a lot of sense to me....at the same time, it explains why its coming out so soon after the 8800....but even if it is true, why wouldnt they hold back the produced 8300's to sell more 8800s?
It never ceases to amaze me at what some retail people will say. With a distinct lack of knowledge and very poor judgment they will make up stories which in their minds eye, make them look good. Anything to present themselves as something they are not, professional salespeople.

This "accident" theory is something that only the most gullible person would believe. I'm not suggesting that anyone in this forum is gullible, quite the contrary as most of us are well educated enough to know better. However the harm is when someone like this, tells these far fetched stories only to have someone believe them. At that point it reflects poorly on the Mfg, the Carrier, and anyone else the "story teller" implicates with such nonsense. It's this kind of information that's used to create rumors, the kind of time wasting, reputation damaging, misleading lies that result in nothing but negative, pointless conversation.
__________________
My All Time Favorite: _RED-8310_ Backups: 7130c, 8100, O2 8300, at&t 8300, 8700c, 8800, 8820
Offline  
Old 03-24-2007, 06:29 PM   #17
jgoldenb
Thumbs Must Hurt
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Model: 8700
Carrier: rogers
Posts: 114
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by archer6
It never ceases to amaze me at what some retail people will say. With a distinct lack of knowledge and very poor judgment they will make up stories which in their minds eye, make them look good. Anything to present themselves as something they are not, professional salespeople.

This "accident" theory is something that only the most gullible person would believe. I'm not suggesting that anyone in this forum is gullible, quite the contrary as most of us are well educated enough to know better. However the harm is when someone like this, tells these far fetched stories only to have someone believe them. At that point it reflects poorly on the Mfg, the Carrier, and anyone else the "story teller" implicates with such nonsense. It's this kind of information that's used to create rumors, the kind of time wasting, reputation damaging, misleading lies that result in nothing but negative, pointless conversation.
I agree. and in retrospect there was no point for me to post the story he told me...it just seemed "noteworthy" if nothing else, coming from the owner of a Rogers Wireless store...
Offline  
Old 03-24-2007, 07:01 PM   #18
wayneholbrook
Talking BlackBerry Encyclopedia
 
wayneholbrook's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Miami Florida
Model: 9000
PIN: 20D214AB
Carrier: AT&T
Posts: 282
Default

get over it already..no big deal..................it was a rumor. WOW!
__________________
An army of asses led by a lion is vastly superior to an army of lions led by an ass.
Offline  
Old 03-24-2007, 07:04 PM   #19
archer6
BlackBerry Extraordinaire
 
archer6's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: California, USA
Model: 8310
Carrier: at&t
Posts: 1,105
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by jgoldenb
I agree. and in retrospect there was no point for me to post the story he told me...it just seemed "noteworthy" if nothing else, coming from the owner of a Rogers Wireless store...
I think you were right to post the story.

I agree that we need to hear about this type of thing just to remind us, and anyone else that reads this forum, of the way the store employees or in this case the owner of the store hands out misleading info. I happen to know that this and other BB forums are read by people at RIM and the various Carriers. It's a very valuable resource of customer feedback for those organizations, and they know it.

Cheers.....
__________________
My All Time Favorite: _RED-8310_ Backups: 7130c, 8100, O2 8300, at&t 8300, 8700c, 8800, 8820
Offline  
Old 03-24-2007, 09:30 PM   #20
sean76
CrackBerry Addict
 
sean76's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: NYC
Model: 9700
OS: 6.0.0.358
Carrier: AT&T, VZW
Posts: 704
Default

Here's my take on this! BG speculated that the 8300 could roll out as soon as 3 to 4 weeks, while this sounds crazy to alot us because of the 8800 just being released, it making perfect sense from a business point of view! RIM knows that the launch of the 8300 will raise them to the top of the food chain in the ever expanding world of smartphones and pda's. So what they do is roll out the 8800, and we all get excited about a new device launch and buy one. Then BOOM, they drop the 8300 series on our lap. They know that along with the rest of the world, alot of us are going to go out and pick up the 8300 when just weeks ago we already got the 8800. They'll have there loyal following along with a slew of new people just drooling over the idea of a BLACKBERRY with a camera and a full keyboard. Classic sales tactics to draw more unit sales. We could all sit around and be mad at RIM for tricking us, but at the end of the day alot of us are going to go out and pick up the 8300 the day it comes out!
I know I will!
Offline  
Closed Thread



Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


128K RAM - APPLE - ORIGINAL APPLE prototype BOARD picture

128K RAM - APPLE - ORIGINAL APPLE prototype BOARD

$408.75



APPLE 630-0895-B  VRAM 128K X 8 BOARD CARD VINTAGE picture

APPLE 630-0895-B VRAM 128K X 8 BOARD CARD VINTAGE

$74.77



APPLE 820-0522-A 630-0895-B LITE VRAM 128K X 8 BOARD  picture

APPLE 820-0522-A 630-0895-B LITE VRAM 128K X 8 BOARD

$149.99







Copyright © 2004-2016 BlackBerryForums.com.
The names RIM © and BlackBerry © are registered Trademarks of BlackBerry Inc.