BlackBerry Forums Support Community
              

Closed Thread
 
Thread Tools
Old 08-11-2005, 10:25 AM   #1
JoeSpotown
Knows Where the Search Button Is
 
JoeSpotown's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Model: 8100
Carrier: T Mobile
Posts: 24
Default Motorola Q: Final Design?!

Please Login to Remove!

Came across the final design of the Motorola "Q" on cnet today. Man, that looks hot, but its still no blackberry. Seems like its got a bit of bb and treo in itself. Too bad its on windows lol. What do you guys think of all this?
Attached Thumbnails
Click image for larger version

Name:	31473357-2-300-front-2[1].gif
Views:	110
Size:	16.0 KB
ID:	314   Click image for larger version

Name:	31473357-2-300-sides-3[1].gif
Views:	88
Size:	10.6 KB
ID:	315   Click image for larger version

Name:	31473357-2-300-back-4[1].gif
Views:	66
Size:	15.7 KB
ID:	316   Click image for larger version

Name:	47473911q[1].jpg
Views:	121
Size:	33.0 KB
ID:	317  
__________________
Blackberry 7100t 5/2005
PIN: 2019E7D8

Last edited by JoeSpotown; 08-11-2005 at 11:11 AM..
Offline  
Old 08-11-2005, 10:28 AM   #2
stonent
BlackBerry Extraordinaire
 
stonent's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Fort Worth, Texas
Model: 8220
PIN: FFFFFFFF
Carrier: T-Mobile
Posts: 1,734
Default

Hmm, a scroll wheel... Interesting
__________________
Stonent

Prior: BES: 7510, 7520, 7290, 7230, 7130, 8220 (No Data Plan), Droid Eris
Post your question on the forum, don't PM me.
Offline  
Old 08-11-2005, 10:37 AM   #3
BBAdmin
BlackBerry Extraordinaire
 
BBAdmin's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Port 3101.org
Model: .
Carrier: .
Posts: 2,491
Default

I think a lot of phone manufacturers have cottoned on that there's two things that work well on email based phones - qwerty keyboards and trackwheels. The days of full on touchscreens seem to be passing by which is great because they're annoying to use, they have poor battery life and you always lose the stylus!!!! Companies like this are desparate (as are Microsoft) to really have a go at the push email market which is a good thing as this will only make RIM push (excuse the pun) the envelope further to make BlackBerry an even better product than it already is. These phones are all really geared up for the push email on Exchange 2K3 SP2 - and Microsoft must be rubbing their hands together as Treo, HTC and Motorola start building these phones.

That said, despite all the security features on BlackBerry (which is really only admired by Admins like us), the top notch executive or CEO's main concern is return on investment. The running costs are so compelling on BlackBerry (as a result of the compression) that BlackBerry is bound to remain the top contender, not to mention how much these smart phones are likely to cost compared to a 7290 or 7100 - a big financial consideration if you've got 50, 100, 200 handsets to deploy throughout your mobile workforce.
__________________

Offline  
Old 08-11-2005, 12:04 PM   #4
jasonb
Thumbs Must Hurt
 
jasonb's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Stuck in the Limbo of Reality
Model: 7100T
Carrier: AT&T
Posts: 158
Default

It seems to be a cool design. But, being the anti-microsoft person that I am really would not want windows on my phone. Just from the issues that it has on the desktop environment. But, I would agree that M$ is attempting to get into the push market and I think that RIM will get a little more motivated with some competition for that niche.
__________________
"Imagination is more important than knowledge." - Albert Einstein

PIN - 202F0651
Offline  
Old 08-11-2005, 02:25 PM   #5
TXBBUSER
Thumbs Must Hurt
 
Join Date: May 2005
Model: 7100T
Posts: 65
Default

The biggest advantage I see to the Q is that it is so expandable. The BB has such limited memory, and no memory slot, that you are really limited in what you can add to it. MS may be a lot of things, but they know how to give customers what they want. And those of us with a 7100 know that BB isn't without its own bug problems.
Offline  
Old 08-11-2005, 04:09 PM   #6
darkmark
Knows Where the Search Button Is
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: London
Model: Bold
Carrier: o2
Posts: 34
Default

I agree with some of the bug problems (which to be fair do get fixed!) but can i ask why you feel you need more memory?

Not disagreeing as much as playing devils advocate. Having spoken to RIM they feel that with their compression they don't need to grow memory as fast as bloaty MS products (agree) but with new developments (stuff like powerpoint being delivered as graphics image rather than stripped of graphics, and voice mms files being delivered) they will need more memory.

I had the whole execs like mp3's will u ever support them discussion with a very very senior (ML big clue) director as my most senior management love their ipods and mp3 devices for international travel and got a very vague not so sure type answer so hold out no real hope.

Should be getting a Q soon, have head of emea mobility coming to see me monday but even he doesn't have one at the moment, when I get one I'll let you all know. He got me an MPX (mpx300) as well as many other devices, so hoping for him to come thru with this beta, and my contact in motorola says they are considering bb connect so even tho its ms it could still be bb.

again, all speculation at this time but if I hear anything solid i'm allowed to share i will!


Mark
Offline  
Old 08-11-2005, 04:37 PM   #7
ChrisLuce
Talking BlackBerry Encyclopedia
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Roseville, Ca
Model: 9000
Carrier: ATT
Posts: 247
Default

I like the design but it look a bit BIG in the picture. I am not sure if it is just the picture but I will have to go look on CNET and check out the deminsions.
__________________
Chris Luce
PIN: 20D5D63B
Offline  
Old 08-11-2005, 09:21 PM   #8
SUFan
Thumbs Must Hurt
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Model: 8100
Carrier: Cingular
Posts: 157
Default

The keyboard doesn't look as useful/friendly as the Blackberry. Reminds me of a Treo keyboard which I found to be hard to type on compared to the BB.
Offline  
Old 08-12-2005, 11:19 AM   #9
TXBBUSER
Thumbs Must Hurt
 
Join Date: May 2005
Model: 7100T
Posts: 65
Default

I'd like more memory so I can have more stuff on my phone. For example, on my iPaq, I had a bunch of books, saved pdf files, mp3 etc. I know the BB doesn't offer some of that functionality yet, but that may be because there is not enough memory to handle it, right? What I'd like to see is someone provide to me one device that allows me to do everything . . . read ebooks, make calls, send and check email, listen to music. That way, i don't have to carry multiple devices. THe BB is very close, but the Treo is closer, and this Q seems to get closer still. With the Q having an SD slot, you could have a couple gigs of music with you all the time. That would be great.
Offline  
Old 08-12-2005, 11:24 AM   #10
BBAdmin
BlackBerry Extraordinaire
 
BBAdmin's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Port 3101.org
Model: .
Carrier: .
Posts: 2,491
Default

Having storage capacity on board would be a fatal mistake to make. Part of the security of BlackBerry is that users do not store sensative infoamtion locally on devices. No point running AES encryption when your user stores sensative material on their devcie and then leaves it on the tube or the back of a taxi!!! I know most of us would store tunes and things, but the corporate user would store all those important documents....I fear that more than anything else!!!! At the end of the day, if you want media buy a PMP unit - that'll do a better job as a media device than a Treo or 'Q'
__________________

Offline  
Old 08-13-2005, 10:58 AM   #11
ajg
Thumbs Must Hurt
 
ajg's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Chicago
Model: M600i
Carrier: T-Mobile
Posts: 109
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by jasonb
It seems to be a cool design. But, being the anti-microsoft person that I am really would not want windows on my phone. Just from the issues that it has on the desktop environment. But, I would agree that M$ is attempting to get into the push market and I think that RIM will get a little more motivated with some competition for that niche.
Amen... Windows couldn't run my computer correctly (or at all HAHA) and so I don't think I'm ready to put my faith into Windows running my phone. It is after all my only mode of voice communication... no landline. I can't hav emy phone crashings or getting malware and stupid stuff like that.
Offline  
Old 08-13-2005, 11:05 AM   #12
ChrisLuce
Talking BlackBerry Encyclopedia
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Roseville, Ca
Model: 9000
Carrier: ATT
Posts: 247
Default

Hmmmm, I do like the keyboard. I do not think more memory is a mistake at all. The whole point of having a mobile device such as a Laptop, PDA & thumbdrives is to assure you have your data with you all the time. That's why there is password protection on you BB. Anyway, that's how I feel.
__________________
Chris Luce
PIN: 20D5D63B
Offline  
Old 08-13-2005, 12:06 PM   #13
T-Roy
CrackBerry Addict
 
T-Roy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Model: 8800
Carrier: Darth Vader
Posts: 704
Default

I saw a black model someone posted a link to engadet in the rumor mill.
Offline  
Old 08-13-2005, 12:40 PM   #14
TXBBUSER
Thumbs Must Hurt
 
Join Date: May 2005
Model: 7100T
Posts: 65
Default

Well, first, you don't have to use the memory slot if you don't want to. I've heard this security thing come up before and just don't get it. If you are worried about forgetting important documents, then don't put them on a medium that you can lose. I guess you don't travel with a laptop either, right? Secondly, to please those of you who are security conscious, a model without a memory slot could be provided. It doesn't have to be one size fits all.

My whole point is that I don't want to have to buy a separate device. I want one device that does it all, and since I always have my phone with me, I'd like that one device to be my phone. I realize MS has some issues, but they actually have been getting better lately, and the days of just bashing MS are close to over (and this from me, a diehard Mac user). I use XP for work, and have had it crash only once in the last year, and that was a result of an aborted install. My iPac rarely had problems, far fewer than I had with my Palm, and, I have to say, FAR FAR fewer than I've had with my 7100, so whose software is the most buggy?
Offline  
Old 08-13-2005, 02:14 PM   #15
Rodolfo
Thumbs Must Hurt
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 56
Default

First, I like it (or the images I've seen) *very* much, and part of what I like is the BB-like keyboard and scroll wheel. My guess is we'll learn that Motorola has licensed these features from RIM. I believe the v-form of the keyboard and slanted keys, along with the scroll wheel, are RIM patents and is what they sued Handspring over a few years ago. I had the Treo 270 and that was the best keyboard Treo has had and it had the scroll wheel (although on the left/wrong side). Handspring had to change the keyboard and lose the scroll wheel after that suit.

Second, the other thing I like is the Win Mobile software. The 7100t is my first BB and I like it. I've had it since March and am lucky to have gotten a very stable and reliable issue. I have not had a single reset, and although reception is spotty (when in motion), I have had only one dropped call in 5 months. The mail functionailty (I have BWC/BIS) is superb and the size and weight are remarkable: oz./mg-for-oz./mg. and bang-for-the-buck, this is the best device out there. YET, the software for BBs is remarkably limited and remarkably static, at RIM and elsewhere. If this Q device proves reasonably reliable and has strong mail functionailty, I'll probably be all over it ~60 days after its release. Unless a great 7200t comes out and gets me first.

Last edited by Rodolfo; 08-14-2005 at 09:25 AM..
Offline  
Old 08-14-2005, 10:33 PM   #16
Prophet
New Member
 
Prophet's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Maryland...for now
Model: 7100T
Posts: 11
Default

...so Motorola ripped off design aspects of the Treo and the BB...wow, so much for original thinking.
First off, it's a windows based OS...what about MAC users...hmm
Secondly, it's a little big (at least according to the pictures)
Third, even though Moto might have some decent phones, they're not exactly at the top of their game when it comes to smart phones...or even long lasting phones at that...
__________________
I won't be satisfied until I have a computer that fits in my pocket...
Offline  
Closed Thread



Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


JOHNSON CONTROLS MS-VMA1615-1 VAV Controller 3 Univ Inputs 2 Binary Outputs picture

JOHNSON CONTROLS MS-VMA1615-1 VAV Controller 3 Univ Inputs 2 Binary Outputs

$200.00



MS-VMA1620-0 JOHNSON CONTROLS METASYS  Control W Manual Override  NEW Open BOX picture

MS-VMA1620-0 JOHNSON CONTROLS METASYS Control W Manual Override NEW Open BOX

$250.00



Metasys Johnson Controls (lot of 10)  AP-VMA1420-0 coupling/bushing AP-VMA1410-0 picture

Metasys Johnson Controls (lot of 10)  AP-VMA1420-0 coupling/bushing AP-VMA1410-0

$50.00



Johnson Controls Metasys AS-VAV 111-1 Variable Air Volume Digital Controller  picture

Johnson Controls Metasys AS-VAV 111-1 Variable Air Volume Digital Controller

$95.00



OEM Johnson Controls Economizer SE-ECO1001 picture

OEM Johnson Controls Economizer SE-ECO1001

$114.95



JOHNSON CONTROLS NS-BTB7002-0 / NSBTB70020 (NEW IN BOX) picture

JOHNSON CONTROLS NS-BTB7002-0 / NSBTB70020 (NEW IN BOX)

$120.00







Copyright © 2004-2016 BlackBerryForums.com.
The names RIM © and BlackBerry © are registered Trademarks of BlackBerry Inc.